Published on July 29th, 2017 | by Tina Casey
July 29th, 2017 by Tina Casey
File this one under “E” for “Elections have consequences.” Former Republican North Carolina Governor and fossil fuel fan Pat McCrory lost his 2016 re-election bid in stunning fashion to Democrat Roy Cooper, who leveraged public enthusiasm for renewable energy during his campaign. As a result, the state’s renewable energy activity is set to accelerate. On July 27, Cooper signed HB 589 into law, putting new regulations in motion aimed at reaching a statewide solar target of 6,800 megawatts by 2020 — more than double what it has now.
That’s the good news. The bad news is that Governor Cooper signed the bill despite an anti-wind amendment that slid into the process at the last minute … although, Cooper could get the last laugh after all.
McCrory Vs. Renewable Energy, Guess Who Won
Former Governor McCrory staked his political fortune on the fossil-friendly Koch brothers and North Carolina businessman Art Pope, among other conservative supporters, but his efforts to stymie renewable energy development during his relatively brief tenure (2013–2017) had mixed results.
North Carolina already had an aggressive solar energy policy cemented in place due to its relatively liberal interpretation of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA is national legislation designed to promote energy efficiency and renewable energy in the aftermath of the 1970s oil crisis).
That meant North Carolina was well prepared for the solar boom that began under the Obama Administration. By the time President Obama left office, North Carolina followed only California in installed solar capacity.
When measured by rate of growth, North Carolina is also among the leaders of the solar pack. Our friends over at the News & Observer report the latest solar news based on a new report from the Environment North Carolina Research and Policy Center (following are snippets):
“North Carolina has seen the third-greatest increase in the nation in solar energy production since 2007. … North Carolina has increased solar energy production from one gigawatt hour in 2007 to 4,016 in 2016, per the report. At that usage rate, North Carolina could have solar-powered just 92 homes for a year in 2007, compared to 371,439 in 2016.”
So far, so good.
Good News For Solar, Bad News For Wind…
The new solar law probably doesn’t make everyone happy, but it apparently comes close. Among other provisions, it enables solar developers to access low-cost financing, permits property owners to lease rooftop solar panels, and sets out a process for selecting sites for utility-scale solar farms.
The new law also enables state residents to buy into offsite solar farms owned by utilities, meaning that residents have a way to get renewable energy credits even if they don’t have solar panels on their own property.
The picture is not nearly as bright for wind power. Last month, CleanTechnica was among those taking note of a push by several Republican legislators to impose a moratorium on wind development in the state.
Though the anti-wind faction was opposed by other Republicans as well as Democrats, they still managed to insert an 18-month moratorium amendment into HB 589.
That’s not as bad as the four-year moratorium originally proposed, but it puts a huge crimp in wind development. So, why did Cooper go ahead and sign the bill?
In an official statement last Thursday, Cooper took the perspective of half a loaf is better than none:
“This bill is critical for the future of significant increases in our already booming solar industry. I strongly oppose the ugly, last-minute, politically motivated wind moratorium. However, this fragile and hard fought solar deal will be lost if I veto this legislation and that veto is sustained.”
And, it looks like Cooper had a trick up his sleeve.
… Then, Good News For Wind
The anti-wind faction didn’t get much time to celebrate their victory. On the same day that he signed HB 589, Cooper also signed Executive Order 11, expressly aimed at mitigating the impact of the moratorium:
“This executive order directs DEQ to continue recruiting wind energy investments and to move forward with all of the behind the scenes work involved with bringing wind energy projects online, including reviewing permits and conducting pre-application review for prospective sites.”
Supporters of the wind moratorium argued that North Carolina could risk losing some of its military facilities due to encroachment by wind farms, but EO 11 makes it clear that those concerns are moot:
“North Carolina is the most military friendly state in the country and the wind permit process already rightly directs the Department of Environmental Quality to consider military bases and flight paths when permitting wind farms.”
The Department of Defense is not concerned. Here’s the rundown from a Pentagon consultant:
“[E]very single wind turbine that is built in the country has had multiple sets of military eyes on it … if a wind turbine has been built and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration, you can guarantee that it’s compatible with a nearby military flight mission.”
It remains to be seen if EO 11 withstands any legal challenge, and if it provides wind investors with enough security to continue working through the permit process during the moratorium.
Avengrid Renewables won the North Carolina lease in March, and so far the company doesn’t seem to concerned about the wind moratorium.
After all, the offshore area is in federal waters, far beyond the reach of state legislators.
Follow me on Twitter.
Image via Solar Energy Industries Association
Check out our new 93-page EV report, based on over 2,000 surveys collected from EV drivers in 49 of 50 US states, 26 European countries, and 9 Canadian provinces.
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Flipboard (Opens in new window)
- Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
About the Author
Tina Casey specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.